Main Menu
Recent News
Latest Articles
Random photos


Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index
   Titanic news
   TITANIC'S SISTERS

Browsing this Thread:   26 Anonymous Users

 

  Bottom    Previous Topic    Next Topic
  •  Rate Thread
      Rate this Thread
      Excellent
      Good
      Average
      Bad
      Terrible
Poster Thread Rated:  2 Votes
  •  Captain Dan
      Captain Dan
Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS
#1

Joined: 2007/3/27
From Maryland, United States
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:

MGY Friend wrote:
The United States is still held up in mothball somewhere, correct?

You say you are partial to Olympic. Do you believe that the Olympics (all three of them) would still be hailed as the most favorite old liners if not for the fame of Titanic sinking?

To my understanding from maritime historians, in her days of service, Olympic was a wonderful ship and was loved to an extent by some regular passengers, but at the same time, she did not have the same appeal and popularity that the Mauretania or Aquitania had. Or, maybe, people were aprehensive about sailing on Olympic because of what happened to Titanic.

I have always wondered though, if it was the Olympic that sank on her maiden voyage instead of the Titanic (and assuming some of the same things happened), would the tragedy be a larger spectacle in regards to public response? I ask this because Olympic was the first of the class, and from what I have read, her maiden voyage was actually a larger attention grabber in the papers. Titanic was second of the class, and from what I can see, her departure, and even her launch, were not as glamorized as Olympic's.

These are probably dumb and irrelovent questions, but what do you think?


The Big 'U' as the SS United States was also called, is at the Walt Whitman Bridge in Pennsylvania. I intend to visit this summer. She isn't open for tours, but just a chance to see that ship is a treat in itself. She was the fastest ocean liner ever built, with 240,000 horsepower steam turbines, over a hundred thousand more than here nearest rival. She was designed by Francis Gibbs, the same man who designed the Missouri. She had a cruising speed of about 36 knots, and could attain a maximum speed of 43 knots, 20 in reverse. She was the last ship to take the Blue Riband.

But I digress; this is a Titanic forum Back to the subject at hand.

I do believe that had Titanic not sunk, only ship buffs like us would know of her. Heck, if one is not a ship buff, Mauretania would be unknown to most, excepting the rare few who paid attention to its mention in Titanic at the beginning of the film.

Given some of the events leading up to Titanic's launch, it was probably good that it was the Titanic and not the Olympic; she was not at full capacity on her maiden voyage (don't know if the Olympic was or was not, but there was a lengthy coal strike going on at the time, which disrupted schedules and though it ended on April 6th, only 922 passengers were aboard when she left Southhampton, picking up more at Cherbourg and Queenstown to bring the total to 1316, barely half of Titanic's capacity.

Anyway, I don't think they're dumb questions at all

Daniel
Posted on: 2007/3/29 23:35
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
Subject Poster Date
     Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS Danny J 2007/3/18 22:53
       Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS Danny J 2007/3/27 1:00
         Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS Captain Dan 2007/3/28 14:44
           Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS Danny J 2007/3/28 20:51
             Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS MGY Friend 2007/3/28 21:46
             Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS Captain Dan 2007/3/29 1:28
               Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS MGY Friend 2007/3/29 14:29
                 Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS Captain Dan 2007/3/29 16:00
                   Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS MGY Friend 2007/3/29 18:49
                     Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS Mark Chirnside 2007/3/29 23:00
                     Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS Captain Dan 2007/3/29 23:35
                       Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS Mark Chirnside 2007/3/30 9:36
                         Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS MGY Friend 2007/3/30 15:42
                           Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS Mark Chirnside 2007/3/30 18:25
                             Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS Captain Dan 2007/3/31 22:04
                               Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS MGY Friend 2007/3/31 23:08
                                 Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS Mark Chirnside 2007/4/2 9:27
                                   Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS MGY Friend 2007/4/2 14:38
                                     Re: TITANIC'S SISTERS Mark Chirnside 2007/4/2 15:30
 Top   Previous Topic   Next Topic

 


 You cannot start a new topic.
 You can view topic.
 You cannot reply to posts.
 You cannot edit your posts.
 You cannot delete your posts.
 You cannot add new polls.
 You cannot vote in polls.
 You cannot attach files to posts.
 You cannot post without approval.



Copyright © 2006-2012 Titanic.com
Home Photos Advertise Link to us Flower Box