![]() ![]() ![]() |
Browsing this Thread:
21 Anonymous Users
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
---|
Poster | Thread | Rated:![]() |
---|
|
Re: why didnt titanic | #1 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users ![]() |
Its often misunderstood that Titanic and her sister's did not have big enough ruders. But The ships turning rate is perfectly acceptible by todays standards.
I was under the impression Red rockets where used for distress signals. and that Titanic did not have any. I dont think reversing the engines helped things either. One thing I dont get is why did Titanic or Olympic have the water tight bulheads all the way up, a mean it's like an ice cube tray how they spill over, so why did andrews not feel it nessesary to extend them all the way up? |
|||
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/2/15 20:22
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|