 Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic historic  Hindsight is 20/20 but think if:
|
Browsing this Thread:
10 Anonymous Users
 Bottom  Previous Topic  Next Topic |
|
|
|
|---|
Topic options
Flat
Newest First| Poster | Thread |
|---|
|
Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if: | #1 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/2/19
From Philadelphia
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users  |
The proper response to avoiding that iceberg should have been:
Hard to starboard, port shaft all back full, starboard shaft all ahead flank. This would have made the port shaft pull backwards, the starboard shaft would have kept pushing, this would have decreased the turn radius of the ship. Not saying this would have avoided the collision, but it would dramatically reduce the chance of it, or at least minimizing damage. |
|||
|
_________________
Jack and Rose are not real people. |
||||
Posted on: 2005/2/20 23:47
  |
  |
|||
ReefBlue
Visit Website| Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|---|---|
 Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if: |
kjbevin | 2005/2/1 4:42 |
| Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if: |
sundance | 2005/2/1 5:01 |
| Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if: |
brian412 | 2005/2/3 2:23 |
| Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if: |
Nat | 2005/2/3 11:54 |
| Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if: |
Johno | 2005/2/18 16:11 |
| Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if: |
Martyn | 2005/2/18 17:22 |
| Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if: |
Johno | 2005/2/18 20:21 |
| Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if: |
Stardreamer | 2005/2/23 16:33 |
| Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if: |
Johno | 2005/2/23 16:57 |
| Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if: |
Martyn | 2005/5/29 18:31 |
| Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if: |
ReefBlue | 2005/2/20 23:47 |
| Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if: |
Johno | 2005/2/21 15:10 |
 Top Previous Topic Next Topic |
 |
|
You cannot start a new topic.
You can view topic.
